SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(All) 687

GIRIDHAR MALAVIYA, KUNDAN SINGH
UMA KANT PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.S.DWIVEDI, I.K.Chaturvedi

GIRIDHAR MALAVIYA, J.

( 1 ) THE Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karvi, District Banda in Case No. 20/ix/94, P. S. Mau u/sections 218, 167. 120b, 420 and 500 of I. P. C. by his order dated 7 -7 - 1995 summoned the applicant Uma Kant Pandey and five others on a complaint filed before him by one Chimmi. It was alleged in the complaint that after the death of her husband Deomati her mother-in-law O. P. No. 2 and Sangam Lal her brother-in-law did not want her to get the land of her husband and taking advantage of her stay with her parents respondent No. 2 Deomati by setting up some other women to impersonate her wanted to get the said land transferred by means of a registered deed. Consequently, on 20-61991 she gave an application to the Registrar in the Registration Office that if any such a transfer deed might be produced before him the same may not be registered. This application frustrated the design of respondent No. 2. The complainant wanted to get her share in the agricultural land separated and consequently made an application before the Assistant Collector I Class, Banda on 4-4-1992. This case was abated under the Consolidation of Holdings Act. Thereafter on 16- 7 -1991 s





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top