SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(All) 167

B.L.YADAV
KISHAN LAL SINGHANIA – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT JUDGE, KANPUR NAGAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
PUNAM SRIVASTAV

B. L. YADAV, J.

( 1 ) BY the present petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India the order dated 15-7-1989 passed by the District Judge, Kanpur Nagar, rejecting the application filed by the petitioner for dismissing the suit filed by respondent No. 2 for ejectment and arrears of rent as in the said suit the relief for ejectment in same suit which was not permissible under law and the suit was bad for multifariousness of the cause of action.

( 2 ) THE factual matrix of the case is that the plaintiff respondent No. 2 has filed a suit for ejectment and arrears of rent in repect of Flat No. 1 and Flat No. 2 on the third floor of House No. 26/41-42-43, Birhana Road, Kanpur. Flat No. 1 was let out to Ms. Singhania and Sons Pvt. Ltd. in June, 1959 for a rent of Rs. 200. 00 per month which was later on enhanced to Rs. 260. 00 and Rs. 270. 00 per month. Whereas Flat No. 2 was let out to the same tenant on a rent of Rs. 175/ - and later on enhanced to Rs. 189. 00 and Rs. 236. 75. 00 per month. But later on the present petitioner as Managing Director of the said firm was permitted to occupy the said flats by the landlord. However, the rent receipt was issued in the name of original te



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top