SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(All) 630

G.B.SINGH
DWARIKA PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.D.Pathak, Rekha Nigam, Subodh K.Shukla

( 1 ) THIS criminal revision is directed against the order dated 22-9-1981 passed by the 1st Addl. Sessions Judge, Bahraich, holding that the Magistrate cannot take cognizance against Vidya Sagar Singh, opposite party No. 2, and Nebu Lal, opposite party No. 3, without sanction under S. 197, Cr. P. C.

( 2 ) DWARIKA Prasad Sharma revisionist filed a complaint against Vidya Sagar Singh and Nebu Lal for offences under Ss. 192, 196, 418, 164, 163, 120, 504, 463, 500 and 465, I. P. C. on 27-2-1981 on the allegation that Vidya Sagar Singh is Executive Engineer in Asthai Khand No. 2, Sarvjanik Nirman Vibhag, Bahraich and Nebu Lal is an accountant in that Khand. Five tenders were invited for pavement of Bahraich-Barabanki-Banda road between 32 Kms. and 36 Kms. by the Executive Engineer of the aforesaid Khand on 3-11-80 the revisionist submitted tenders in time and they were accepted but the Executive Engineer and the Accountant did not give any information to the complainant about the same though he had been going to the office very often and making enquiry about the result of his tenders. The complainant gave an application on 8-1-1981 to the Executive Engineer to inform him about the resu



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top