SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(All) 31

B.D.AGRAWAL
BHARTI RAJ – Appellant
Versus
SUMESH SACHDEO – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BALDEV RAJ, N.C.UPADHYAY

B. D. AGRAWAL, J.

( 1 ) THESE are petitioners applications. Facts relevant in so far as material for this purpose are that a child was born to Smt. Alka Sachdeo wife of Sri Sudesh Sachdeo on 16th Nov. , 1981 at 10. 40 p. m. in the Nazareth Hospital, Allahabad. Smt. (Dr.) Bharti Raj wife of Baldeo Raj delivered twins the same day at 10. 50 p. m. and 11. 00 p. m. respectively in the same hospital. The petitioners case is that one of these twins was a male and the other a female and further that the child born of Smt. Alka Sachdeo was female. It is alleged that the hospital staff in collusion made an interchange whereby the petitioners male child was passed over to Smt. Alka Sachdeo and replaced by the female child of the latter. Sri Baldeo Raj gave an application to the Director, Nazareth Hospital on Nov. 20, 1981, expressing doubt that one of his children had been changed in this hospital from the labour room. The Director replied the same day after inquiry made by him that there had been no replacement or change of any kind and pointing further that blood test could not be had in the hospital and that the applicant might get the blood test of the female babies done if he so wished.










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top