SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(All) 328

M.WAHAJUDDIN
RAMA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
RAM PRAKASH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.N.SINGHA, Sankatha Rai

M. WAHAJUDDIN, J.

( 1 ) RESPONDENTS-PLAINTIFFS filed a suit against the appellants for their ejectment, arrears of rent and mesne profit. The suit was filed, on the allegation that the defendants were wilful defaulters and a combined notice of demand and termination of tenancy has been given and their tenancy stands terminated.

( 2 ) BESIDES other pleas the defendants maintained that any notice was not served upon them so neither they are defaulters nor their tenancy stands terminated. It would appear that a registered notice was sent addressed separately to defendant No. 1, the mother as well as defendant No. 2, the son who were co-tenants at Varanasi address on 4-8-1970. On the two notices there is an endorsement of the postman dated 8-8-1970 that the addressee refused to accept the notice, and the service was claimed by denial. The stand of the defendants was that defendant No. 2 who is employed in Government Cement Factory Dala, District Mirzapur and ordinarily resides there, had to perform Mundan ceremony of his son at Vindhyachal Mirzapur, so he sent a letter to his mother to come to Mirzapur by 6-8-1970 evening and they both would proceed for such. Mundan on 7-8-1970 and they







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top