SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(All) 93

M.P.SAXENA
SHIV DUTT SINGH – Appellant
Versus
RAM DASS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Radha Krishna

M. P. SAXENA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a plaintiffs appeal against the judgment and decree dated 27-4-1971 passed by the 1st addl. Civil Judge, Meerut.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated the facts are that the plaintiff is the owner of the disputed shop and the defendant-respondent was its tenant on a rent of Rs. 5 per month. This accommodation was governed by the provisions of U. P. Act No. 3 of 1947. The plaintiff-appellant filed that suit for the recovery of Rs. 172 as arrears of rent from 1-8-1966 to 16-61969 and for pen-dente lite and future damages amounting to Rs. 6. 33 up to 30-7-1969. He had also prayed for ejectment of the defendant from the disputed shop.

( 3 ) THE simple allegations were that the defendant was in arrears of rent from 1-8-1966 to 30-4-1969 and he did not pay it in spite of service of notice of demand and ejectment on 17-5-1969

( 4 ) THE defendant contested the suit, inter alia; on the grounds that; he had been regularly paying the rent and on the plaintiffs refusal he had sent it by Money Order and also deposited the same under Section 7-C of the said Act. He further pleaded that he had not refused to take any notice and that the notice to quit, if any, was waived as the plain








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top