M. C. DESAI, C. J.

( 1 ) THE Judge (Revisions) has submitted to this Court a statement of case and has formulated the following question : whether centrifugal water pumps used for pumping water from tube well are exempt from tax on the ground that they are agricultural implements within the meaning of item No. 18 of notification No. S. T. 119/x-928 of the U. P. Government issued under Section 4 of the U. P. Sales Tax Act ?

( 2 ) THE assessee, at whose instance the question has been referred is a dealer in centrifugal water pumps and other iron goods. The question is whether the turnover of sale of water pumps is exempt from sales tax under Notification No. S. T. 119/x-928-1948, dated 7th June 1948, item no. 18, "agricultural implements" The assessee contended that since centrifugal water pumps may be used for drawing water from wells for purposes of irrigation they are agricultural implements within the meaning of the notification. The notification does not define "agricultural implements". "implements" means, according to Murrays dictionary, "the apparatus, or set of utensils, instruments, etc. employed in any trade or in executing any piece of work. " Accordingly "agricultural implements" means the apparatus or instruments employed in agriculture. Merely because water pumped out from wells by means of the water pumps can be used for irrigation, it cannot be said that they are instruments employed in agriculture. In Bharat Engineering and foundry Works v. The U. P. Government [1963] 14 S. T. C. 262, we dealt with the meanings of "agriculture" and "agricultural implement" and stated that any implement that is used in an agricultural process is an agricultural implement. Pumping water from a well is not by itself an agricultural process. We concede that irrigating agricultural land is an agricultural process or operation, but merely because water pumped out from a well by means of a water pump may be used for irrigation it cannot be said that pumping out water by means of a pump is itself an agricultural operation or process. Actually agricultural process or operation will start after water has been pumped out and stored ; it will start when it is taken out from the storage tank towards the land to be irrigated. The case of a persian wheel may be different because there it may be used direct, i. e. , without being stored or collected for irrigating land. A persian wheel may be worked out at one end and without anything being done a field may be irrigated at the other end; the working of the persian wheel directly and automatically results in the irrigation. But the position with a centrifugal water pump is different. It is not used like a persian wheel directly for irrigating land ; it is used solely for lifting water out from a well. Water pumped out may be used for any purpose and not exclusively or even predominantly for irrigation. In the case of Bharat engineerins and Foundry Works1, this Court held that a cane crusher is not an agricultural implement within the meaning of the notification because it is used in preparation of gur after an agricultural process has come to an end. Similarly in the instant case a centrifugal water pump cannot be said to be an agricultural implement because it is used before an agricultural process stsections. Irrigating agricultural land is an agricultural process but it starts when water is diverted towards the agricultural land to irrigate it. A centrifugal water pump is used before this process commences and is, therefore, not an agricultural implement. A persian wheel itself directs water to the land to be irrigated. It is also used exclusively for irrigation.

( 3 ) IN Corpus Juris Secundum, Vol. 42, page 404, "implement" is interpreted to mean "an instrument, tool or utensil used by man to accomplish a given work; a thing necessary to any trade, without which the work cannot be performed", and "implements of husbandry" are construed to mean those things necessary for carrying on of the b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document