M. C. DESAI, J. N. TAKRU, S. N. DWIVEDI
RAM SARAN TEWARI – Appellant
Versus
RAJ BAHADUR VARMA AND ORS. – Respondent
( 1 ) I would answer the question in the negative; I regret I cannot agree with the view expressed by my learned brothers to the effect that Nyaya Panchayats are as courts subordinate to this Court within the meaning of Section 3 of the Contempt of Courts Act. They may be "courts" but I am not persuaded to hold them to be subordinate to this Court. in the case of Sukhdeo Baiswar v. Brij Bhusan, AIR 1951 All 667 referred to by them. I did hold that they are subordinate to this court but I revised the view in State of Uttar Pradesh v. Ram Ratan Shukla, AIR 1956 All 2. 58 and Bishun Kant v. Vijai Bahadur Singh, Cr. Misc. Contempt Case No. 6 of 1959, D/25-11-1959 (All ).
( 2 ) NEITHER (the Contempt of Courts Act nor the Constitution, ,nor any other enactment explains which Courts are subordinate to this Court. The Government of India Act and the Constitution have used different phrases to describe how other Courts stand in relation to the High Court of the territory they being "inferior courts", subordinate courts and "courts over which a High court has powers of superintendence", "court to which an appeal (ordinarily) lies, and there is nothing to indicate that they all
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.