SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(All) 101

O. H. MOOTHAM, RAGHUBAR DAYAL, A. P. SRIVASTAVA
N. C. AGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
KRISHAN LAL MEHRA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.L.Gupta, R.S.PATHAK

DAYAL, J.

( 1 ) THE following two questions have been referred for decision to us:

" (1) Can a District Magistrate under Section 7 (2) of the U. P. (Temporary) Control of Rent and eviction Act (III of 1947) order the proprietor landlord to let a portion of the accommodation to the person who occupied it as a sub-tenant of the tenant-in-chief after the tenant-in-chief has been ejected and the landlord has been ordered to let the entire accommodation to a new tenant and the new tenant and the landlord have entered into a contract of tenancy with respect to the whole house? (2) Can the new tenant object to the subsequent order of allotment in favour of the previous sub-tenant if he (the new tenant) had not entered into procession of the portion of accommodation allotted to the sub-tenant?"

( 2 ) THE admitted facts of the case are that the proprietor of premises No. 37/52, Gilis Bazar, kanpur let them to Gauri Shanker Bhargava and obtained a decree of ejectment against his tenant, This decree was executed on the 4th of October 1955.

( 3 ) GAURI Shanker Bhargava had let certain, portions of these premises to other persons as sub-tenants, one of such sub-tenants was N. C. Agarwala.

( 4 ) K


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top