SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(All) 98

V.G.OAK, A.P.SRIVASTAVA, D.P.UNIYAL
BABA KHALIL AHAMAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.R.USMANI, GOPAL BEHARI, J.R.BHATT, S.HAIDER SHAUKAT, SADIQ ALI

OAK, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application by Baba Khalil Ahmad under Section 99-B, Cr. P. C. for setting aside an order of the State Government under Section 99-A, Cr. P. C. for the forfeiture of six books written by the applicant.

( 2 ) THE applicant has filed two affidavits in support of his application. According to these affidavits, there is a consensus of opinion of Muslim Ulemas that, Yasid, son of Muawiya was the chief perpetrator of Karbala. In November 1952, a handbill was published in Benaras describing Yasid as one entitled to be admitted to heaven. In other pamphlets Muawiya was praised and was represented as a leader of Hanafi Muslims. The applicant is a Sunni Musalmari of Hanafi sect. He considered it his duty to dispel doubts and misunderstanding about the position of Yasid and Muawiya in Muslim history. With the object, the applicant wrote the six books, which were subsequently forfeited by the State Government. The applicant never intended to wound or outrage the religions feelings of any person.

( 3 ) THE Home Secretary to U. P. Government filed a written statement on behalf of the government. According to the written statement, the six books in question were prescribe



















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top