SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(All) 41

RAGHUBAR DAYAL, O. H. MOOTHAM
MUKAT BEHARILAL AGARWAL VAKIL – Appellant
Versus
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE (EXECUTIVE), BAREILLY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BRIJLAL GUPTA, S.N.MISRA

O. H. MOOTHAM, CJ.

( 1 ) THIS is an application under Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act. The applicant, who is a pleader, desires to appeal to this Court from a judgment and decree passed by Mr. Justice Oak dated the 28th April, 1958. The period of limitation for the filing of the appeal was 60 days, and that period expired on the 27th June, 1958. The Court however was then closed for the vacation, and under Section 4 of the Limitation Act the memorandum of appeal could have been presented on the day on which the Court reopened which was the 12th July. The applicant applied for a copy of the decree against which he desired to appeal on the 30th june and for a copy of the judgment on the 4th July, that is to say after the expiry of the period of 60 days but before the end of the vacation. The copy of the judgment was ready on the 4th august, that of the decree on the 21st August. The memorandum of appeal was presented on the 11th September.

( 2 ) PRIMA facie, the memorandum of appeal was presented 76 days after the expiry of the period of limitation. It is however contended on behalf of the applicant that in computing the period of limitation he is entitled to exclude the time





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top