SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(All) 46

A. P. SRIVASTAVA, O. H. MOOTHAM
STATE OF U. P. – Appellant
Versus
MOHAMMAD IBRAHIM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.S.DHAVAN

O. H. MOOTHAM, CJ.

( 1 ) THIS is an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court from an order of this Court dated the 2nd April 1957. The respondent was a Sub-Inspector of Police, and in September, 1951 he was charged under Section 7 of the Police Act with being remiss in and unfit for the discharge of his duty in that he had committed thirteen specific acts of misconduct which were therein set out. Aft the ensuing departmental enquiry the Superintendent of Police who conducted it held that four of these charges had been satisfactorily proved and that a fifth had been partially proven. The finding of the Superintendent of Police in respect of the first four of these five charges was confirmed by the Deputy Inspector , General of Police, s Range, who by an order dated the 17th july, 1952, dismissed the respondent from service. From this order the respondent appealed to the Inspector General of Police but that appeal was dismissed on the 24th June, 1953. The respondent then applied unsuccessfully to the State Government for the revision of the order of dismissal, his application being rejected on the 22nd November, 1954. This Court by the order which is the subject of the pre










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top