SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(All) 128

O. H. MOOTHAM, RAGHUBAR DAYAL
KUMAR JAGDISH CHANDRA – Appellant
Versus
BULAQI DAS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Brij Lal Gupta, Radha Krishna

RAGHUBAR DAYAL, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a Special Appeal against the judgment of Mr. Justice Oak allowing the execution second appeal by the respondents-decree-holders.

( 2 ) KUNWAR Jagdish Chandra, appellant, the owner of the plot in dispute leased it to Bulaqi Das and Narain Das respondents for a term of 11 years on 31-10-1930. The respondents sub-leased the plot and the sub-lessee constructed a building on it. Later on the appellant purchased the materials of that building when sold in execution of a decree and took possession of the plot and the building. In 1933 the respondents instituted the civil suit out of which has arisen this appeal for the recovery of possession and mesne profits against Jag-dish Chandra, appellant. On 2-1-1935 the suit was decreed for possession as well as for mesne profits and the decree directed payment of pendente lite and future mesne profits at the rate of Rs. 30/-per mensem until delivery of possession.

( 3 ) JAGDISH Chandra filed an appeal against that decree and the decree-holders filed a cross-objection. The appeal was dismissed. The cross-objection was allowed to the extent that the rate of mesne profits was enhanced by Rs. 5/- per mensem. A second





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top