SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(All) 221

O. H. MOOTHAM, RAGHUBAR DAYAL
RAM AUTAR – Appellant
Versus
RENT CONTROL, EVICTION OFFICER, JHANSI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.BANERJEE

O. H. MOOTHAM, CJ.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal against an order of Mr. Justice James dated the 17th September, 1958, dismissing a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution.

( 2 ) THE appellant is the owner of two adjacent houses, one of which was in the occupation of a tenant. On the 17th October, 1956, the tenant vacated that house and made over possession of it to the appellant. Two days later on the 19th October, the appellant informed the Rent Control and Eviction Officer that the premises had fallen vacant, and at the same time he asked that they be released in his favour as they were needed by him for his personal occupation. On the 31st October the appellant appeared before the Rent Control and Eviction Officer and his statement was recorded. No action was however taken by the Rent Control and Eviction Officer and on the 24th November the appellant wrote to that officer informing him that he had occupied the premises and that they should not be allotted to any other person. On the 7th December, 1955, the Rent Control and Eviction Officer made an order rejecting the appellants application that the premises be released in his favour, and by an order dated the 8th December he a












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top