SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(All) 28

MOOTHAM, KIDWAI, H. S. CHATURVEDI
MOHAMMAD AMIR AHMAD KHAN – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.N.ROY, Ghulam Imam, Inayatullah, Sarvari Niamatullah

KIDWAI, J.

( 1 ) RAJA Mohammad Amir Ahmad Khan of Mahmudabad in the district of Sitapur executed a deed of waqf. Having duly signed it and got it attested, he presented it on 15-9-1948, under section 31, Stamp Act, (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") to the Deputy Commissioner (Collector) of Sitapur for his opinion as to the stamp duty with which it was chargeable. The Deputy Commissioner, being himself in doubt, referred the matter to the Board of Revenue under Section 56 (2) of the Act. The matter remained pending before the Board for a considerable length of time but eventually it was held that the document was a deed of settlement as defined in Section 2 (24) of the Act and as such liable to duty in accordance with Article 58.

( 2 ) ON 29-10-1951, the Deputy Commissioner held that Rs. 85,598/7/- were payable as stamp duty in respect of the deed and ordered that the Raja should deposit the said amount within 15 days. A notice to this effect was served on the Raja on 10-11-1951, and he moved a petition in this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution but that was rejected in November 1952 as being premature.

( 3 ) ON 2-2-1954, a further notice was served upon the Raja direc










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top