SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(All) 79

MEHROTRA, MUKERJI
INDA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
BOARD OF REVENUE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.N.AGARWAL, MUKUND LAL AGARWALA, S.C.KHARE

MEHROTRA, J.

( 1 ) THESE are two applications under Article 133 of the Constitution praying that leave be granted to the applicant to appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgments of this Court in Civil Misc. Writs Nos. 1358 and 1359 of 1954.

( 2 ) THE facts, as set out in the petition briefly are that Sri Shankar Lal, father of the applicant, who was a zamindar of village Deorampur, had certain sir plots Nos. 88, 130, 131 and 148 in the said village. Two suite were filed on or about 29-9-1947, which were Nos. 103 and 104 of 1947 under Sections 175/179, U. P. Tenancy Act against the opposite parties Brij Lal, Sewa Ram and kalika for ejectment. These two suits along with two other suits, which were filed against one bachchan, were consolidated and were heard together by the Assistant Collector, First Class, parrukhabad who decreed the suits for ejectment. The petitioner executed her decree and got possession over the plots on 29-6-1948. Appeals were filed by the opposite parties to the Commissioner and they were consolidated with the appeals filed by Bachchan against the decrees in his suits. The appeals were allowed on the ground that the plaints did not contain certain particu














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top