SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(All) 70

MOOTHAM, AGARWALA
(MAHANT) PARSHOTAM DAS – Appellant
Versus
PREM NARAIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMBIKA PRASAD, B.DAYAL, J.Swarup

AGARWALA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application by a receiver appointed by this Court during the pendency of the appeal in the Supreme Court. The prayer of the applicant is that the order of the court below be set aside and he be permitted to obtain actual cultivatory posses sion over the Sir and Khudkasht lands in dispute in. the case,

( 2 ) THE facts of the case, briefly stated, are as-follows. The suit out of which the Supreme court-appeal has arisen was filed by one Mahant Uma Shankar against the applicant Mahant prem Das for possession over the endowed property of which the last Mahant was one Bhola das. Uma Shankar claimed to be the Chela of Mahant Bholadas and duly elected as the Mahant of the estate after the death of Bholadas. This claim was contested by the applicant Mahant Prem Das who claimed himself to be entitled to succeed as Mabant after the death of Mahant Bholadas.

( 3 ) THE property in dispute included certain Sir and Khudkasht plots. During the pendency of the suit, the Court below appointed, one Ghet Ram as receiver of the zamindari property including the Sir and Khudkasht land in dispute by an order dated 6-12-1943. The receiver took charge of the zamin-dari property




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top