SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(All) 54

MOOTHAM, RAGHUBAR DAYAL
RAMZAN BAKSH – Appellant
Versus
NIZAMUDDIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
SATISH CHANDRA, SHANTI BHUSHAN

MOOTHAM, CJ.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal from a judgment and decree of the Additional Civil Judge, Bijnor, dismissing an appeal from the judgment and decree of the Munsif of Bijnor in a suit for partition.

( 2 ) THE dispute between the parties relates to certain property which belonged to one Tafazzul hussain. After Tafazzul Husains death one of his heirs sold his undivided share in the property to the first appellant. Sometime thereafter the respondents, who are the remaining heirs, instituted the suit out of which this appeal arises for partition of the entire property. They claimed that they were entitled under Section 4 of the Partition Act, 1893, to include in the property the subject of the suit the share of the first appellant upon payment to him of the value of his share. The appellant raised several defences. He contended, first, that after the death of Tafazzul husain the heirs partitioned the latters property and that he had acquired the share which had been allotted to his vendor in this partition; alternatively he denied that Section 4 of the Partition act had any application as the property in which he had acquired a share was not a dwelling house, and because he had not


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top