MOOTHAM, AGARWALA
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Appellant
Versus
KANHAIYA LAL MAKUND LAL SARRAF – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is an appeal from an order of Chaturvedi J. dated 30-11-1954. The respondent firm is a dealer in bullion and in gold and silver ornaments, and as part of its business it entered into forward contracts in silver. In respect of such contracts it was assessed to Sales Tax for the years 1948-49, 1949-50 and 1950-51 in the sums of Rs. 150/12/-, Rs. 474/- and 741/- a total of Rs. 1,365/12/- and these amounts were duly paid. In 1952 this Court held in -- budh Prakash Jai Prakash v. Sales Tax Officer, Kanpur, AIR 1952 all 764 (A), that the provisions of the U. P. Sales Tax Act purporting to impose a sales tax on forward contracts were ultra vires -- a decision later upheld by the Supreme Court in the --sales tax Officer Pilibhit v. Budh Prakash Jai Prakash, AIR 1954 SC 459 (B) -- and thereupon the respondent firm applied to the Commissioner of Sales Tax U. P. , for a refund of the aforesaid sum of Rs. 1,365/12/ -. A refund was refused, and the respondent firm filed the petition out of which this appeal arises praying for the issue of a writ of mandamus requiring the Sales Tax Officer, the Commissioner of Sales Tax and the State Government to refund the sum of Rs. 1,
REFERRED TO : Budh Prakash Jai Prakash v. Sales Tax Officer, Kanpur
Shiba Prasad Singh v. Maharaja Srish Chandra
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.