SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(All) 50

MALIK, AGARWALA
GAYA RAI – Appellant
Versus
LALJI RAI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
JANAKI PRASAD, KANHAIYA LAL MISHRA

MALIK, CJ.

( 1 ) A preliminary objection has been raised that this appeal should not have been filed in this court and should have been filed in the Court of the learned District Judge. The plaintiff filed an application under Section 12, U. P. Agriculturists Relief Act for redemption of a large number of mortgages. The suit was decreed in part. Under Section 23, U. P. Agriculturists Relief Act an appeal against such a decree lies to the Court to which original decrees passed by such Courts are ordinarily appealable and where such decrees are appealable to more Courts than one, to the court of lowest jurisdiction. Section 21, Bengal, Agra and Assam Civil Courts Act (Act 12 of 1887) provides that

"an appeal from a decree or order of a Subordinate Judge (in this state Civil Judge) shall lie (a) to the District Judge where the value of the original suit in which or in any proceeding arising out of which the decree or order was made did not exceed five thousand rupees, and (b) to the High Court in any other case. " It is, therefore, clear that an appeal from a decree of a civil Judge would lie to the District Judge or to the High Court according to the valuation of the suit. Section 23,





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top