( 1 ) THE plaintiff-appellant filed a suit for possession of a share of the property left by one Bhoop singh who died in the year 1882. Bhoop Singh had a son Megh Singh and also left a widow srimati Janki Kunwar. Mutation was effected in the village papers half and half in the names of janki Kunwar and Megh Singh. Megh Singh died in 1901 and his eight-annas share in the property was mutated in favour of his widow, Srimati Lal Kunwar, and his son, Rustam, half and half. On Rustams death in 1903 Lal Kunwars name was recorded on that four-annas share also, with the result that Janki Kunwars name remained recorded over eight-annas share and Lal kunwars name over the remaining eight-annas. In 1910 Janki Kunwar died leaving a daughter and a daughters son, who are defendants to this suit. They claimed mutation over the eight-annas share which had been entered in the name of janki Kunwar, and Lal Kunwar objected and claimed that the entire property had come to her by inheritance. Lal Kunwars objection was dismissed, but she filed an appeal. During the pendency of the appeal on 23-6-1910, the parties entered into a compromise by which the defendants were given a one-third share