SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1947 Supreme(All) 53

HARISH CHANDRA
Ram Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Emperor – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
C.S. Saran, For the Appellant /

JUDGMENT

Harish Chandra, J. - Ram Prasad Singh and Salik Singh, father and son, residents of village Khampur in police circle Baksa in the district of Jauapur, were prosecuted along with one Tinmia Singh, a nephew of Ram Prasad Singh, under Sections 323 and 304 read with Section 34 of the Indian(sic) Penal Code. Tinmin Singh was acquitted by the learned Sessions Judge of Jaunpur. The Appellants were also acquitted of the charge u/s 302 read with Section 34, I.P.C., but he convicted them under Sections 323 and 304 read with Section 34, I.P.C., and sentenced them each to one year's and five years' R.I. respectively for the two, offences. The two sentences have been ordered to run concurrently.

2. The complainant Mahadeo Singh and his brother Ram Sunder Singh deceased belonged to village Karchuli in police circle Machhlishahr in the district of Jaunpur. Village Karchuli is situated at a distance of about two miles from village Khampur. The Appellants and the complainant are descended from common an esters, the father of the complainant. Mahadeo Singh being a brother of the grandfather of the Appellant Ram Prasad Singh. The families have been separate since a long time, but certain Khata

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top