SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(All) 208

MALIK, MUSHTAQ AHMAD
MOTI LAL JHUN JHUNIA – Appellant
Versus
MOOL CHAND – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMBIKA PRASAD, G.S.PATHAK, Krishna Shankar, S.N.KATJU, WALTER DUTT

MALIK, CJ.


( 1 ) THIS is a plaintiffs appeal in a suit for damages. The lower Court decreed the plaintiffs suit for rs. 1,327-8-0. The plaintiff had, however, claimed as damages Rs. 11,872-7 0. This appeal is for the balance, i. e. Rs. 10,644 15-0 only. On 2nd December 1941 there was a contract between the plaintiff and the defendant by which the defendant agreed to purchase ten cases of katan silk, panchtara Brand No. 13. 15 at the rate of Rs. 30-6-6 per pound, the date of delivery being 18th december 1941. According to the custom of the market the buyer was entitled to two days grace.

( 2 ) THE case of the plaintiff is that on the due date he sent a wire to the defendant to take delivery of the ten cases but that the defendant put it off till the Amawasya Day which was the 20th of december. On 20th December, the plaintiff got from the Central Bank of India 14 cases, 8 half and 6 full, of katan silk for delivery to the defendant. Up to here the facts are not in dispute, The plaintiffs further story was that he had sent these cases to the defendant but that the defendant had refused to take them. This story has been disbelieved by the lower Court, and it has not been seriously pre





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top