SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(All) 205

MALIK
GIRJA SHANKAR – Appellant
Versus
JAGANNATH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.D.Srivastava, N.Banerjee

MALIK, CJ.


( 1 ) ONE Ram Nath executed a simple mortgage on 8-11-1930 in favour of Jagannath plaintiff. In the mortgage deed a 1/6th share in certain properties was included. The mortgage was for Rs. 700 and the amount was payable after one year. On the date of the mortgage Ram Nath was, however, owner of only a 1/9th share in the mortgage. In 1932 Ram Kumar, nephew of Ram nath, died and Ram Nath inherited a 1/18th share in the property from Ram Kumar and thus became the owner of a 1/6th share of the property. Thereafter Ram Nath died and on 17-5-1933, the widow of Ram Nath as guardian of her minor sons defendants 1 and 2 executed a mortgage in favour of defendants 3 and 4. The mortgage was of a 1/18th share in the same property. In this mortgage deed no mention was made of the first mortgage. Jagannath, plaintiff, filed a suit on the basis of the mortgage dated 3-11-1930, out of which this appeal has arisen, for sale of the 1/6th share included in his mortgage. Defendants 1 and 2 did not defend the suit, bat defendants 3 and 4 took up the plea that their 1/18 share of the property was not saleable, as Ram Nath was the owner of only a 1/9th share when he executed the mortgage date



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top