SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(All) 394

MALIK, AGARWALA, MUSHTAQ AHMAD
ABDUL WAHAB KHAN – Appellant
Versus
MOHD. HAMID ULLAH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Brij Mohan Lal Srivastava, D.P.UMYAL, MAN SINGH

C. J. AGARWALA, J.

( 1 ) MOHAMMAD Hamiduallah made an appln. under Section 145, Criminal P. C. complaining that abdul Wahab Khan was trying to close the door of his (Mohammad Hamidullahs) house opening into a lane as also a drain passing through the lane and joining the municipal drain by constructing a wall across the door. Ho alleged that he had been using the lane for passage through the door for the last 20 years and that the action of the opposite party was likely to cause a breach of the peace. The appln. , though ostensibly made under Section 145, was in reality under section 147, Criminal P. C.

( 2 ) THE Mag. issued notice to the opposite party who replied that he was the owner of the lane on which the appct. claimed a right of way. According to him, the appct. had opened the door in question a short time ago during his absence from Allahabad. He denied the existence of the drain and the right of way claimed by Mohammad Hamiduallah.

( 3 ) THE Mag. found that the open land had been used as a lane by the inmates of Mohammad hamiduallahs house for several years past and that the opposite party had recently Started the construction of the wall in front of the disputed door. He











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top