S.RAFAT ALAM, SUDHIR AGARWAL
SHAMI AHMAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
By the Court.—Heard Sri S.K. Mishra, learned Counsel for the appellant and also perused the judgment of the Hon’ble Single Judge dismissing the appellant’s writ petition challenging the order of his transfer.
2. Learned Counsel for the appellant vehemently contended that the impugned order of transfer having been passed at the behest of the Minister, Animal Husbandry and hence it is malicious in law and cannot be sustained.
3. After perusing the record as well as the judgment under appeal we are of the view that no interference is called for in this appeal. It appears that initially the appellant was posted as Live Stock Extension Officer at Cattle Care Centre, Niyamtabad, District Chandauli wherefrom he was transferred to Cattle Care Centre, Dulhipur vide Chief Veterinary Officer, District Chandauli’s order dated 14.8.2006 and in his place one Ram Awadh Yadav, Live Stock Extension Officer was posted at Niyamtabad. Subsequently vide order dated 24.8.2006 the earlier order of transfer was modified and the appellant was posted at Kamalpur/Dhanapur instead of Dulhipur and one Mohd. Hafiz was transferred from Bhismpur Chakia to Niyamtabad. The order dated 24.8.2006 thereafter was
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.