SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(All) 243

S.RAFAT ALAM, SUDHIR AGARWAL
SHAMI AHMAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S.K. Mishra for the Appellant; S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—Heard Sri S.K. Mishra, learned Counsel for the appellant and also perused the judgment of the Hon’ble Single Judge dismissing the appellant’s writ petition challenging the order of his transfer.

2. Learned Counsel for the appellant vehemently contended that the impugned order of transfer having been passed at the behest of the Minister, Animal Husbandry and hence it is malicious in law and cannot be sustained.

3. After perusing the record as well as the judgment under appeal we are of the view that no interference is called for in this appeal. It appears that initially the appellant was posted as Live Stock Extension Officer at Cattle Care Centre, Niyamtabad, District Chandauli wherefrom he was transferred to Cattle Care Centre, Dulhipur vide Chief Veterinary Officer, District Chandauli’s order dated 14.8.2006 and in his place one Ram Awadh Yadav, Live Stock Extension Officer was posted at Niyamtabad. Subsequently vide order dated 24.8.2006 the earlier order of transfer was modified and the appellant was posted at Kamalpur/Dhanapur instead of Dulhipur and one Mohd. Hafiz was transferred from Bhismpur Chakia to Niyamtabad. The order dated 24.8.2006 thereafter was










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top