PRAKASH KRISHNA
RAMESH CHANDRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Hon’ble Prakash Krishna, J.—In all the above writ petitions, a common question of law is involved. In these writ petitions, quashing of notification issued under Section 6 of the U.P.C.H. Act has been sought for. The writ petition (PIL) No. 47304 of 2005 is the leading case. The arguments were heard in the said writ petition.
2. The writ petition No. 10070 of 2006 is with respect to the notification issued under Section 6 of the Act relating to villages Bachgaon, Bhidarwa, Julendhi and Sakha, Pargana, Tehsil & District Mathura dated 21.7.2005.
3. Writ Petition No. 57395 of 2008 relates to the village Kuchesar, Pargana and Tehsil Siyana, District Bulandshahar which was notified for consolidation proceedings under Section 4 of the Act. The Consolidation Commissioner by the order dated 25th July, 2008 impugned in the present writ petition has dismissed the representation of the petitioners to keep the village outside the purview of the consolidation operation. The quashing of the said order has been sought for.
4. The writ petition No. 58410 of 2008 is in respect of notification dated 25th October, 2007 issued by the Consolidation Commissioner, U.P. Lucknow under Section 6 of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.