SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(All) 767

ASHOK BHUSHAN, ARUN TANDON
GOVIND LAL SRIVASTAVA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Govind Lal Srivastava (In Person) for the Petitioner; M.A. Qadeer, S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—Heard Sri Govind Lal petitioner in person and learned Standing Counsel on behalf of the respondents.

2. Petitioner before this Court was appointed as Block Development Officer in the Rural Development Department of the State of Uttar Pradesh after selection by the U.P. Public Service Commission by direct recruitment on 17.8.1984. The petitioner was placed under suspension pending enquiry into the charges under an order dated 30th March, 1992. This order of suspension was subjected to challenge by means of Writ Petition No. 1835 of 1992. The writ petition was disposed of by the Court with a direction to respondent authorities to complete the departmental proceedings against the petitioner within two months from the date a certified copy of the order is filed before the authority concerned. Since departmental proceedings were not completed against the petitioner within the time specified, the writ petitioner filed second petition, being Writ Petition No. 46862 of 1992. A Division Bench of this Court by means of order dated 6.11.1992 was pleased to revoke the order of suspension with liberty to the State respondents to conduct the enquiry in accordance with the r







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top