C. K. PRASAD, A. P. SAHI
VINOD KUMAR PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
By the Court.—Writ petitioner-appellant, aggrieved by judgment and order dated 5.5.2009 passed by learned Judge of this Court in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 23613 of 2009, has preferred this appeal under Chapter VIII Rule 5 of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952.
2. Short facts giving rise to the present appeal are that the writ petitioner-appellant (hereinafter referred to as the ‘appellant’) was employed as Constable in the Civil Police. By order dated 30.6.2007, he was transferred from Civil Police to Government Railway Police. He assailed the said order in the writ petition, inter alia, contending that his transfer from Civil Police to Government Railway Police is in violation of Regulation 525 of the U.P. Police Regulations (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Regulations’). According to the appellant, as he remained in the Civil Police for more than 10 years, in view of the language of Regulation 525 of the Regulations, he cannot be transferred to Government Railway Police. The aforesaid submission did not find favour with the learned Judge and the learned Judge declined to interfere with the order of transfer and dismissed the writ petition.
3. Mr. Satish Dwivedi, appe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.