Honble Mrs. Poonam Srivastava, J.—Heard Sri Siddhartha Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner/tenant and Sri Rahul Sahai Advocate for the contesting respondents.

2. The prayer in the instant writ petition is for quashing the judgment and order dated 29.1.2009 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No. 10, Badaun in Rent Appeal No. 24 of 2006, Yogendra Kumar Agarwal v. Smt. Sushma Gupta preferred against the judgment and order in Rent Case No. 2 of 2002 dated 28.4.2006 passed by the Prescribed Authority/Civil Judge (Senior Division), Badaun. An application was filed by landlady for release of the disputed shop to settle her two sons namely Mohit and Rohit in business, under Section 21(1)(a) of the U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972 (hereinafter referred as the Act). The application was filed by Smt. Sushma Devi wife of Rajendra Kumar Agarwal. The petitioner filed objection to the said release application pleading that the shop in question was only source of his livelihood and he will face greater hardship than the applicant-respondent-landlord who has already 10 shops at the disposal at Bareilly from which the sons of the landlady can start their business. The t