2009 Supreme(All) 3117
[2010(1) ADJ 448 (DB)]
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : C.K. PRASAD, C.J. AND A.P. SAHI, J.
ADNAN AHMAD .....Petitioner
Versus
SANA ULLAH AND OTHERS ....Respondents
(Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 44688 of 2009, decided on 9th September, 2009)
Counsel :
S.S. Rathore for the Petitioner; S.C. for the Respondents..
Headnote:U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act—Section 122-B, sub-section (4-D)—Public Interest Litigation—Petitioner claiming himself to be a member of Gaon Sabha, seeking relief to direct D.M. to secure removal of unauthorised occupation and encroachment by respondent-1 from two plots of lands, a public property vested in Gaon Sabha—Land in dispute submerged under water and uncultivable (Banjar land) vested in State of U.P. upon abolition of Zamindari—Yet a person claiming possession, which may be lawful or otherwise can set up his defence—And,if it is found that he has some claim, question as to whether property had vested in Gaon Sabha and whether a person is in unauthorised occupation, or not, can be squarely determined in proceedings under Section 122-B—There is no right of representation, which is sought to be made by petitioner—Petitioner can pursuade Gaon Sabha, or apply to competent authority under Section 122-B for taking appropriate action—And, competent authority thereafter have to follow rules as prescribed under said section in order to determine as to whether there is any encroachment, or not—Therefore, petitioner may approach appropriate forum in accordance with law for redressal of his grievance—And, P.I.L. liable to be dismissed. [Paras 4, 5, 6 and 7]
Reslt; Petition Dismissed.
By the Court.—This is a Public Interest Litigation instituted by the petitioner, who claims himself to be a member of the Gaon Sabha of Village Jairajpur, Tehsil Sagri, District Azamgarh. The prayer made in the present petition is to direct the District Magistrate, Azamgarh to secure the removal of unauthorized occupation and encroachment by the respondent No. 1 from two plots of land, which according to the petitioner is public property vested in the Gaon Sabha. It is urged that the District Magistrate has failed to take any action and, therefore, prejudicial to public interest.
2. Shri S.S. Rathore, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that two plots namely plot No. 712 area 0.0180 hectare and plot No. 713 area 0.0310 hectare are entered in the revenue record as land submerged under water and land which is not under cultivation respectively, and therefore, the same being land belonging to the Gaon Sabha cannot be encroached, which is being attempted by the respondent No. 1-Sana Ullah a resident of the same village.
3. We have perused the revenue extract and it appears that plot No. 712 has been entered as an area submerged under water and plot No. 713 has been entered as Banjar (uncultivable land). The provision under which how such encroachments are to be removed at the instance of the Gaon Sabha is provided for in Section 122-B of the U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act, which is quoted below :
“122-B. Powers of the Land Management Committee and the Collector.—(1) Where any property vested under the provisions of this Act in a Gaon Sabha or a local authority is damaged or misappropriated or where any Gaon Sabha or local authority is entitled to take or retain possession of any land under the provisions of this Act and such land is occupied otherwise than in accordance with the provisions of this Act, the Land Management Committee or local authority, as the case may be, shall inform the Assistant Collector concerned in the manner prescribed.
(2) Where from the information received under sub-section (1) or otherwise, the Assistant Collector is satisfied that any property referred to in sub-section (1) has been damaged or misappropriated or any person is in occupation of any land, referred to in that sub-section, in contravention of the provisions of this Act, he shall issue notice to the person concerned to show cause why compensation for damage, misappropriation or wrongful occupation as mentioned in such notice be not recovered from him or, as the case may be, why he should not be evicted from such land.
(3) If the person to whom a notice has been issued under sub-section (2) fails to show cause within the time specified in the notice or within such extended time not exceeding thirty days from the date of service of such notice on such person, as the Assistant Collector may allow in this behalf, or if the cause shown is found to be insufficient, the Assistant Collector may direct that such person may be evicted from the land and may for that purpose, use, or cause to be used such force as may be necessary and may direct that the amount of compensation for damage, misappropriation or wrongful occupation be recovered from such person as arrears of land revenue.
(4) If the Assistant Collector is of opinion that the person showing cause is not guilty of causing the damage or misappropriation or wrongful occupation referred to in the notice under sub-section (2) he shall discharge the notice.
(4-A) Any person aggrieved by the order of the Assistant Collector under sub-section (3) or sub-section (4) may, within thirty days from the date of such order, prefer a revision before the Collector on the grounds mentioned in clauses (a) to (e) of Section 333.
(4-B) The procedure to be followed in any action taken under this section shall be such as may be prescribed.
(4-C) Notwithstanding anything contained in Section 333 or Section 333-A, but subject to the provisions of this section—
(i) every order of the Assistant Collector under thi