SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(All) 3847

C. K. PRASAD, PANKAJ MITHAL
SHOBHA BOSE – Appellant
Versus
JUDGE SMALL CAUSES – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
A.M. Lal for the Petitioner; None for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—This writ petition has been filed for issuance of a direction to respondent No. 1 - Judge, Small Causes (Civil Judge (Senior Division) Allahabad, to decide finally Suit No. 484 of 2007 (Sarjeet Kumar Ghoshal and others v. Km. Shobha Bose and others) as also to respondent No. 2-Additional District Judge, Court No. 10, Allahabad to decide Civil Revision No. 257 of 2009 (Sarjeet Kumar Ghoshal and others v. Km. Shobha Bose and others) within a fixed time.

2. Mr. A.M. Lal, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, submits that because of delaying tactics adopted by the other side, aforesaid suit is not being disposed of expeditiously. It is further pointed out that in case the suit is not decided expeditiously, the petitioner who is an aged lady may not live long to see its result. It is not the case of the petitioner that cases instituted later on have been decided and for one reason or the other, the Judge in seisin of the case is purposely not disposing of her case.

3. The prayer made in this petition for expeditious disposal of the suit/revision, in sum and substance, is nothing but a prayer for out of turn hearing of the suit. We are unaware of the docket of the






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top