C. K. PRASAD, PANKAJ MITHAL
SHOBHA BOSE – Appellant
Versus
JUDGE SMALL CAUSES – Respondent
By the Court.—This writ petition has been filed for issuance of a direction to respondent No. 1 - Judge, Small Causes (Civil Judge (Senior Division) Allahabad, to decide finally Suit No. 484 of 2007 (Sarjeet Kumar Ghoshal and others v. Km. Shobha Bose and others) as also to respondent No. 2-Additional District Judge, Court No. 10, Allahabad to decide Civil Revision No. 257 of 2009 (Sarjeet Kumar Ghoshal and others v. Km. Shobha Bose and others) within a fixed time.
2. Mr. A.M. Lal, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, submits that because of delaying tactics adopted by the other side, aforesaid suit is not being disposed of expeditiously. It is further pointed out that in case the suit is not decided expeditiously, the petitioner who is an aged lady may not live long to see its result. It is not the case of the petitioner that cases instituted later on have been decided and for one reason or the other, the Judge in seisin of the case is purposely not disposing of her case.
3. The prayer made in this petition for expeditious disposal of the suit/revision, in sum and substance, is nothing but a prayer for out of turn hearing of the suit. We are unaware of the docket of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.