AMITAVA LALA, ASHOK SRIVASTAVA
VIPIN BIHARI SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Honble Amitava Lala, J.—Since both the aforesaid writ petitions involving similar controversy are connected with each other, therefore, the same are being decided by this common judgement having binding effect upon both the matters, taking Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 28351 of 2009 as leading one.
2. This writ petition, being Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 28351 of 2009, has been filed by the petitioners praying inter alia as follows:
“(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus declaring the Rule 15 (2) of the Uttar Pradesh Public Works Department Group “B” Civil Engineering Service Rules, 2004, as notified on 3.1.2004 as ultra vires of Article 14 read with Article 16 of the Constitution of India.
(ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the rule making authority to provide for the criteria of written examination followed by viva-voce for the purposes of direct recruitment on the post of Assistant Engineer in Public Works Department.
(iii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari calling for the record and quash the advertisement published in the Employment News dated 7-13th June, 2008 being Advertisemen
AIR 1955 SC 19 (Para 7)-Distinguished
(1985) 4 SCC 417 : 1986 SCC (L&S) 88 (Para 12)
2003(2) LBESR 899 (All) (DB) (Para 9)
2008 (2) ADJ 205 (DB) (Para 10)
2008(9) ADJ 417 (DB) : 2008(5) ESC 3475 (All)(DB) (Para 9)
(2009) 5 SCC 515 (SC) (Para 10)-Relied on and discussed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.