ARUN TANDON
ARUN KUMAR MISHRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Hon’ble Arun Tandon, J.—This bunch of writ petition has been filed by persons who claim to have been appointed as teaching as well as non teaching staff in various aided and recognized intermediate colleges of District Kushi Nagar in the State of Uttar Pradesh. The provision of Intermediate Education Act, 1921 (herein after referred to as the Act of 1921), Uttar Pradesh High Schools and Intermediate Colleges (Payment of Salaries of Teachers and other Employees) Act, 1971 (herein after referred to as the Act of 1971) and U.P. Secondary Education Services Selection Board Act, 1982 (herein after referred to as the Act of 1982) are applicable to the employees of the institutions involved in these petitions.
2. Most of the writ petitioners seek to challenge the Order dated 27.7.2007 of the State Government holding therein that the earlier Orders dated 24.2.2003 and dated 17.2.2004 by which 46 teaching and non teaching staff (i.e. the petitioners) of various Intermediate Colleges of Kushi Nagar were directed to be adjusted against vacancies in other recognized intermediate colleges, were illegal and inoperative in the eyes of law, in view of the fact that there is no provision fo
(2006) 4 SCC 1-Relied on.
(2009) 5 SCC 65 (Para 21)-Relied on.
2008(8) ADJ 137 : 2008(4) ESC 2610 (All)(DB) (Para 16)-Followed
2007(2) ESC 1116 (All)(DB) (Para 15)-Referred.
AIR 1958 SC 300 (Para 6)-Relied on.
2007(2) ESC 1116 (All)(DB) (Para 15)-Relied on.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.