SATISH CHANDRA, DEVI PRASAD SINGH
CEMENTS INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. , LUCKNOW – Appellant
Versus
COLLECTOR/D. M. , LUCKNOW – Respondent
Hon’ble Devi Prasad Singh, J.—The brief facts giving rise to the present writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, relate to repayment of loan by the borrower to the Pradeshiya Industrial and Investment Corporation, Uttar Pradesh (in short the PICUP), as well as auction and sale of the industry on account of default of payment of loan.
2. Originally, M/s. U.P. Asbestos Limited (in short the UPAL) was engaged in manufacture and sale of asbestos sheets and cement from its industry situate at Mohanlalganj, Lucknow. It was enjoying the benefit of trade tax exemption under Section 4-A of Trade Tax Act, 1948 for a period of 8 years, vide letter dated 23.10.2000. Against the said exemption, under Section 8 (2-A) Tax Deferment Liability was granted and against that, the PICUP granted “interest free trade tax deferment loan” to UPAL for the period 1996-97 to 1999-2000. The properties were mortgaged and the second charge was created by the UPAL on all their movable and immovable assets, like assets of asbestos and cement unit.
3. UPAL sold its cement unit situate at Mohanlalganj, Luckow to M/s. U.P. Cement Limited (in short UPCL) after obtaining due permiss
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.