SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(All) 210

K. B. ASTHANA, GOPINATH, M. P. SAXENA
Banney Khan – Appellant
Versus
The Chief Inspector of Stamp, U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
B.L. Yadav. for Applicant; Standing Counsel, for Opposite Party.

Judgement

SAXENA, J.:- This is a reference under Section 57 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, by the Chief Controlling Revenue

Authority, viz., the Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh.

2. Admittedly in an auction Banney Khan applicant took the contract for collection of toll from the premises known as 'New Sabzimandi' belonging to the Municipal Board, Ujhani, District Budaun, for the period 1st of April, 1967, to March 1968. In pursuance of this auction a document (Annexure I to the Reference) describing the Municipal Board, Ujhani, as "the lessor" and the applicant as "the lessee" was executed by both the parties on 31-3-1967. Stamp duty of Rs. 2.50 was paid on this document. The essential terms of the agreement were that during the said period of one year the lessee will remain in possession of the subject-matter of lease and will realise toll on all the goods at the rates provided by the lessor. The lessee will pay to the lessor for such permission a sum of Rs. 23,700/- out of which Rs. 10,000/- will be paid by 1-4-1967 and the balance will be paid in four instalments of Rs. 3,425/- per month by the end of each succeeding month and, as such, the whole amount will be paid by the end of Aug


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top