S.N.DWIVEDI, GYANENDRA KUMAR, SATISHCHANDRA, R.L.GULATI, HARISWARUP
The Notified Area Committee – Appellant
Versus
Ram Singhasan Prasad Kalwar – Respondent
DWIVEDI, J.:- This appeal is filed against the judgment of a learned Single Judge allowing the writ petition of the respondent. The Bench of two Judges, by whom the appeal was at first heard, referred it to a larger Bench on account of a conflict between two Full Bench decisions. Hence the appeal is listed before us.
2. The Notified Area Committee of Mohammadabad, the first appellant, assessed the respondent with a tax of Rupees 281.25 on his circumstances and property. Rs. 250/- was the amount of tax on circumstances, and Rs. 31.25 on property. Annexure B to the writ petition suggests that he was carrying on some business and had a house. The tax was assessed on March 18, 1968. This assessment was quashed by the learned Single Judge.
3. Far back in 1872, Mohammadabad became a town area. Town areas are now governed by the Town Areas Act, 1914.
Section 14 of this Act provided for the imposition of certain taxes including a tax on a man's circumstances till a part of the year 1948. In that year Section 14 was reshaped. The substituted section materially read:
"(1) Subject to any general rules or special orders of the Local Government in this behalf, the taxes which a committee m
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.