V.G.OAK, SATISHCHANDRA
Swadeshi Cotton Mills Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sales Tax Officer – Respondent
OAK, J. : I have read the judgment prepared by my learned brother Satish Chandra, J. I agree that the sale of food in the canteens maintained by the two mills is liable to tax under the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 (hereafter referred to as the Act); but the fee charged by Aligarh Muslim University to cover expenditure on dining halls is not liable to sales tax.
2. Section 3 is the charging provision, Under S. 3, every dealer has to pay a tax on his turnover. The term "Dealer" has been defined in cl. (c) of S. 2 :
"Dealer" means any person or association of persons carrying on the business of buying or selling goods.....
Admittedly, the two mills are engaged in various operations in order to earn profit. The two companies carry on the business of buying and selling goods. There is no doubt that the two Companies are dealers as defined by the Act.
3. The question has been raised whether the activity of the mills in so far as they sell food in canteens constitutes business. It is true that the mills are under an obligation to maintain the canteens. But that circumstance does not alter the fact that this particular operation is a part of the general activity of the two mills in manuf
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.