F. I. REBELLO, A. P. SAHI
RAJEEV KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
By the Court.—The petitioner - appellant (hereinafter referred to as the ‘appellant’) has filed this appeal against the order of dismissal of the writ petition filed by him, wherein the prayer made by the appellant was to quash the final result dated 17th May, 2010 of the selections in relation to the posts of Police Constables in Uttar Pradesh Police. The contention raised by the appellant was rejected on the ground that the appellant, being a candidate of Other Backward Class, has secured lesser marks than the minimum cut-off marks fixed for the said category and, therefore, no relief can be granted.
2. Shri Hari Om Khare, learned counsel for the appellant, submits that the learned Single Judge did not appreciate the controversy in correct perspective, inasmuch as the selections have been held by applying the provisions of vertical and horizontal reservations in a way that prejudices the candidature of the appellant as against the lesser meritorious candidates of the female category. He submits that, in order to accommodate female category candidates, results have been prepared in a way that contravenes the maximum permissible limit of 20 percent reservation for women cat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.