SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 4121

[2011(1) ADJ 440 (DB)]
ALLAHABAD HIGH Court
BEFORE : F.I. REBELLO, C.J. AND VINEET SARAN, J.
HIZWANA BANO …..Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS ….Respondents
(Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 69019 of 2010, decided on 26th November, 2010)

Advocates:
Counsel :
Raj Karan Yadav for the Petitioner; Dr. Y.K. Srivastava, C.S.C. for the Respondents.

Headnote:Caste Certificate—Verification and cancellation of—Authority for—Petitioner aggrieved by caste certificate issued in favour of respondent No. 3—Complaint against before respondent No. 2 to cancel the same—Respondent No. 2 would cease to have jurisdiction once the caste certificate was issued—Tehsildar in such circumstances would have no authority to cancel the same—Jurisdiction to verify the caste certificate and whether it should be validated or invalidated is of caste scrutiny committee—Therefore, respondent No. 2 cannot be directed to decide the issue in absence of jurisdiction as such. [Paras 9 to 12]

       

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—Admit.

By consent, heard forthwith.

In view of the order, which is proposed to be passed, notice to respondent No. 3 is dispensed with.

2. The petitioner was aggrieved by the caste certificate issued in favour of respondent No. 3. The post of Village Pradhan of Gaon Sabha-Lotha was reserved for female candidate of backward caste. According to the petitioner, respondent No. 3 obtained a caste certificate that she belongs to Muslim Kayasth, which has been issued by respondent No. 2. According to the petitioner, respondent No. 3 belongs to the caste ‘Sekh Firozi’. In the list of Other Backward Class, meant for the State of Uttar Pradesh, this caste has not been included in the category of backward class.

3. On 11.10.2010, the petitioner filed an application to the Assistant Election Officer contending that the caste certificate obtained by respondent No. 3 was forged. Similarly, on 30.10.2010, the petitioner filed a complaint before the respondent No. 2 for cancellation of the caste certificate issued in favour of respondent No. 3. The respondent No. 2, till today, has not taken any decision upon the complaint of the petitioner. According to the petitioner, the respondent No. 2 is the only competent authority to cancel the forged certificate and since he has failed to exercise the jurisdiction vested in him, the present writ petition.

4. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

The State of Uttar Pradesh has issued a notification dated 5th January, 1996 in the matter of issuance of caste certificates in the State of U.P. The English translation of the said notification as per the Official Translation is being reproduced in its entirety and reads as under :

“Chapter 22 Received from General and Merger 1263

(89)

Personnel Section -2

No. 22/16/92 - Ka/1996 - T.C. 111

To,

Kalika Prasad, 1. All Principal Secretaries/Secretaries,

Secretary, Govt. of Uttar Pradesh

Govt. of U. P. 2. All Heads of Departments/Principal Heads of Offices,

Uttar Pradesh.

3. All Divisional Commissioners/District Magistrates,

Uttar Pradesh.

Lucknow: Dated 5th January, 1996

Subject : Caste Certificate for Reservation in Services under the State .

Sir,

I am directed to draw your attention to Govt. Order No. 484/Ka-1 941/1994, dated 29th March , 1994, in para 3 of which it was , in respect of the decision taken under Section 9 of Reservation for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes of Citizens in Uttar Pradesh Public Services Act 1994, intimated by the Government that ‘Caste Certificate’ required for laying claim for reservation in future shall be issued by District Magistrate/Additional District Magistrate/City Magistrate/Tehsildar of the area where the concerned candidate resides or where he was born . But in case of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes , such Certificate may be issued by any other stipendary Magistrate or by the District Social Welfare Officer of the Concerned District as well .

As enclosure to the said Government Order, proformas for the Caste Certificate prescribed by the Government were also issued, of which the proforma of the Caste Certificate for other Backward Classes of Uttar Pradesh has been amended vide proforma enclosed with Government Order No. 22/16/92 - Ka - 2 - 95 - T.C. dated 13th December 1995.

2. In continuation of the above I am directed to say that in compliance with the judgment passed on 2nd September, 1994 by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the Case of Kumari Madhuri Patil v. Additional Commissoner Tribal, 1994 (6) SCC 241 and the Order dated 27th October, 1995 passed in pursuance thereof by Hon’ble High Court, Lucknow Bench Lucknow in Writ Petition No. 2884(M.P.) of 1995 - Dr. Anand Pratap Singh v. Uttar Pradesh and others, the following decisions laying down procedure have been taken by the Government, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 9 of the aforesaid Act :

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top