By the Court.—Admit.

By consent, heard forthwith.

In view of the order, which is proposed to be passed, notice to respondent No. 3 is dispensed with.

2. The petitioner was aggrieved by the caste certificate issued in favour of respondent No. 3. The post of Village Pradhan of Gaon Sabha-Lotha was reserved for female candidate of backward caste. According to the petitioner, respondent No. 3 obtained a caste certificate that she belongs to Muslim Kayasth, which has been issued by respondent No. 2. According to the petitioner, respondent No. 3 belongs to the caste ‘Sekh Firozi’. In the list of Other Backward Class, meant for the State of Uttar Pradesh, this caste has not been included in the category of backward class.

3. On 11.10.2010, the petitioner filed an application to the Assistant Election Officer contending that the caste certificate obtained by respondent No. 3 was forged. Similarly, on 30.10.2010, the petitioner filed a complaint before the respondent No. 2 for cancellation of the caste certificate issued in favour of respondent No. 3. The respondent No. 2, till today, has not taken any decision upon the complaint of the petitioner. According to the petitioner, the r