SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(All) 743

B. P. JEEVAN REDDY
COMMISSIONER SALES TAX U P LUCKNOW – Appellant
Versus
DUNLOP INDIA LIMITED – Respondent


B. P. JEEVAN REDDY, CJ.

These revisions under section 11 of the U. P. Sales Tax Act are preferred by the Commissioner, Sales Tax, Lucknow, against the judgment and order of the Sales Tax Tribunal, Lucknow, allowing the appeals preferred by the respondent-assessee.

The respondent-assessee, M/s. Dunlop India Ltd. , is a registered dealer under the U. P. Sales Tax Act as well as under the Central Sales Tax Act. It deals in tyres of motors, trucks, scooters and cycles, etc. For the assessment year 1975-76 and 1976-77 it submitted its return disclosing the taxable turnover at Rs. 8,90,93,957. 11 and Rs. 9,20,18,922. 23 respectively. It also deposited the requisite amount of tax. The assessing authority, however did not agree with the assessees contention that the tyres and tubes sold by it to dealers holding recognition certificates were exempt from sales tax during the said assessment years. It also did not accept the assessees plea that cycle rims were iron and steel as defined under section 14 of the Central Sales Tax Act and, therefore, subject to the ceiling prescribed in the said section. On this basis the assessing authority enhanced the taxable turnover for both the years agains





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top