The court held that the plaint disclosed a cause of action and rejected the petitioner's application to quash the plaint.

( 1 ) THE petitioner Shri Umesh chandra Saxena, has filed the present writ petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following reliefs :

" (a) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the plaint and the entire proceedings of O. S. No. 360 of 2000 Smt. Mohini Bajpai and others v. U. C. Saxena pending before the respondent no. 1. (b) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the entire impugned orders dated 27-11 -2000 passed by the respondent No. 1. (c) issue any other suitable writ, order or direction which this Honble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case. (d) award cost of the writ petition. "

( 2 ) THE order dated 27-11-2000 which is impugned in the present petition, has been passed by the First Additional Civil Judge, senior Division, Allahabad, respondent No. 1 whereby he had decided the application 14-Ga filed by the petitioner under the provisions of Order 7, Rule 11 of the Code of civil Procedure and also the application No. 6-Ga and objection 13-Ga, by which the respondents Nos. 2 to 6 have prayed for grant of interim mandatory injunction.

( 3 ) HOWEVER, at the time of hearing of the petition with the permission of the Court, the relief No. (b) was amended by replacing the following relief:

" (b) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 27-11-2000 passed on the application under Order 7, Rule 11 of C. P. C. and the order dated 27-11-2000 passed on the application of the plaintiff respondents for granting time for publication. "

( 4 ) BRIEFLY stated the facts giving rise to the present writ petition are that the petitioner claims himself to be the duly elected president of a Society known as Shri Ram chandra Mission, (hereinafter referred to as the Mission) which is regisitered under the provisions of the Societies Registration Act 1860. The registered office of the said Society is at Deevan Jograj, Shahjahanpur in the State of U. P. The Society has its own constitution, Rules, Regulations and Memorandum of Association which are duly certified by the Registrar, Societies. The objects of the Society are as under :

(a) to encourage the down hearted and promote amongst them the easier methods, practicable to them for the attainment of social and moral aims of life, based on the principles of spirituality, translated as Sahaj marg. (b) to promote the feelings of mutual love and universal brotherhood, irrespective of colour, caste or creed. (c) The Mission shall work with aims and objects, solely based on spirituality and will have nothing to do with politics or any other activity, subversion of law and order. "

( 5 ) THE respondents Nos. 2 to 6 filed original suit No. 360 of 2000 in the Court of Civil judge, Senior Division , Allahabad for permanent injunction restraining the petitioner from claiming himself to be the President of the Mission and from taking any money in the name of the society and from having any concern with the centres of the Mission situated at Allahabad, Delhi, Shahjahanpur, bangalore, Calcutta, Madras etc. and the commercial activities of the Mission. The said suit was transferred to the Court of 1st additional Civil Judge, Senior Division, allahabad.

( 6 ) ACCORDING to the petitioner, on 9-8-2000, an application for permission to sue the suit in representative capacity was moved. The respondent No. 1 granted permission to the respondents Nos. 2 to 6 on 9-8-2000 to file suit in the representative capacity. He also passed ex parte temporary injunction in favour of the respondents Nos. 2 to 6. On coming to know about the temporary injunction and filing of the suit in the representative capacity by the respondent nos. 2 to 6, the petitioner filed an application on 13-9-2000 under the provisions of order 7, Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure praying that the plaint may be rejected as the same does not disclose any cause of action. It was also stated in the sa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document