( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against the judgment and order dated 25-9-94 passed by IV Additional Sessions Judge, Pilibhit dismissing the appeal preferred against the judgment and order dated 27-7-1984 passed by Special Judicial Magistrate (Economic Offences), Pilibhit convicting the revisionist under Section 7/16 Prevention of Food Adulteration Act and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months and to fine of Rs. 1000. 00 and further convicting him under Section 7/16 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act read with Rule 50 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules and sentencing him to rigorous imprisonment of 3 months and fine Rupees 500/ -.

( 2 ) THE learned counsel for the revisionist contended that the alleged offence was committed on 25-5-82 and after such a long time it would not be desirable to send the accused to jail. He contended that the Courts below committed illegality in holding that the sample of cow milk was adulterated as it contained 14. 3% solids which was more than the prescribed standard. The learned counsel contended that fatty contents were 6. 8% i. e. 3. 3% more than the prescribed standard and deficiency was with regard to non fetty s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document