B.K.ROY, R.K.SINGH
PEOPLES UNION FOR CIVIL LIBERTIES ALLHABAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent
2. The case of the petitioner is to this effect:- The petitioner is a non-political organisation of such citizens of India who are committed to promote and protect, inter alia, human rights; a copy of its aims and object is being filed as Annexure-1; after recording his satisfaction that the circumstances existed for an immediate action for protection of human rights and to achieve the objects/purpose as contained in S. 2 (1) (d) read with preamble the President of India promulgated Protection of Human Rights Ordinance, 1993 (Ordinance No. 30 of 1993) on 28-9-1993 which was later replaced by the Act; S. 3 of the Act provides that the Central Government shall constitute a body to be known as the National Human Rights Commission (hereinafter referred to as N. H. R. C.) pursuant to which Respondent No. 3 was constituted; S. 21 of the Act
REFERRED TO : Paramjit Kaur v. State of Punjab
State of Punjab v. R. L. Bagga
Ashok K. Johri v. State of U.P.
Misbah Alam Sheikh v. State of Maharashtra
K. Kakkanath v. Govt. of Kerala
Bar Council of U.P. v. Union of India
Hari Maheshwari v. State of U.P.
Tata Cellular v. Union of India
Supreme Court Advocate on Record v. Union of India
Neelabati Behra v. State of Orissa
Common Cause v. Union of India
H.C.Suman v. RENEC Home Building Society
Aeltemesh Rein v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.