SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(All) 1326

R.A.SHARMA, D.K.SETH
RAJIV KUMAR SRIVASTAVA – Appellant
Versus
VICE CHANCELLOR B H U VARANASI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AROOP BANERJI, R.NAQVI, V.K.UPADHYA,

D. K. SETH, J.

In the writ petition it is alleged that the petitioner, a Master of Surgery from Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, was appointed as Medical. Officer (Surgery) in Sir Sunder Lal Hospital of the said University through an appointment let ter dated 4/7th September, 1991 (Annexure 1 to the writ petition ). The petitioner joined the said permanent and substantive post in the said Hospital on 7. 9. 1991 (Annexure 2 to the writ petition ). The appointment of the petitioner was confirmed by letter dated 11. 8. 1993 (Annexure 3 to the writ petition) with effect from 8. 9. 1992. The petitioner was asked to work as Medical Officer (Casuality) in the Casuality Department of the Hospital. Though the petitioner is specialist in Surgery but even after his con firmation the petitioner was compelled to serve in the Casuality department. The petitioners appointment in specialised sub ject could not be utilised in the Casuality Deptt. The petitioner had made successive representations on 23. 4. 1994 (Annexure 5 to the writ petition), 11. 5. 1994 (Annexure 6 to the writ petition) and 31. 5. 1994 (An-nexure 7 to the writ petition) in vain. On these background the petitioner, has prayed

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top