R.A.SHARMA, D.K.SETH
RAJIV KUMAR SRIVASTAVA – Appellant
Versus
VICE CHANCELLOR B H U VARANASI – Respondent
In the writ petition it is alleged that the petitioner, a Master of Surgery from Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, was appointed as Medical. Officer (Surgery) in Sir Sunder Lal Hospital of the said University through an appointment let ter dated 4/7th September, 1991 (Annexure 1 to the writ petition ). The petitioner joined the said permanent and substantive post in the said Hospital on 7. 9. 1991 (Annexure 2 to the writ petition ). The appointment of the petitioner was confirmed by letter dated 11. 8. 1993 (Annexure 3 to the writ petition) with effect from 8. 9. 1992. The petitioner was asked to work as Medical Officer (Casuality) in the Casuality Department of the Hospital. Though the petitioner is specialist in Surgery but even after his con firmation the petitioner was compelled to serve in the Casuality department. The petitioners appointment in specialised sub ject could not be utilised in the Casuality Deptt. The petitioner had made successive representations on 23. 4. 1994 (Annexure 5 to the writ petition), 11. 5. 1994 (Annexure 6 to the writ petition) and 31. 5. 1994 (An-nexure 7 to the writ petition) in vain. On these background the petitioner, has prayed
REFERRED TO : State of Orissa v. Madangopal
Fertilizer Kamagar Union v. Union of India
Calcutta Gas Company v. State of West Bengal
Election Commissioner v. Saka Venkata
Samarth Transport Company v. Regional Transport Authority
Banchhanidhi v. State of Orissa
Divisional Forest Officer v. Ram Sanehi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.