A. L. RAO, R. R. K. TRIVEDI
KAUSHAL KISHORE SING – Appellant
Versus
SHUBH HARAN MISRA – Respondent
2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1 raised a preliminary objection, questioning the maintainability of the special appeal. The submission of the learned counsel is that the order dated 18th July, 1994* has been passed by respondent No, 2 in exercise of the appellate powers as provided in Regulation-3 of Chapter-II of the Regulations framed under the U. P. Intermediate Education, Act, 1921. As the order impugned in this appeal has been passed in a writ petition arising out of an appellate order the appeal is not legally maintainable under Rule 5 of Chapter-VIIl of the Rules of the Court.
3. The learned counsel for the appellant on the other hand submitted that the order of the Deputy Director, Education dated 18th July, 1994 has been passed in exercise of pow
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.