SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(All) 1605

MARKANDEY KATJU, SUNIL AMBWANI
Veekay Connectors (P) Ltd – Appellant
Versus
National Small Industries Corporation Ltd – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.N.Singh, C.S.Singh, S.P.GUPTA, Yashwant Verma,

(1) HEARD Sri S. P. Gupta, learned Senior counsel and Shri Yeshwarit verma for the petitioner and Sri Chandra shekhar Singh, learned counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 3 and Sri B. N. Singh, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2, 4, 5 and 6.

(2) THE petitioner has challenged the impugned orders dated 25-3-2004 (Annexure 9 to the petition) and 30-6-2004 (Annexure 14 to the petition).

(3) SINCE we are deciding the case on a purely legal point in our opinion it is not necessary for us to call for counter affidavit. We have heard learned counsel for the respondents.

(4) THE petitioner is a private limited company registered under the Indian Companies act, and is primarily engaged in the manufacture of Fibre Optic Communication accessories.

(5) ON 13-3-2002 the Bharat Sanchar nigam Limited respondent No. 2 (hereinafter called B. S. N. L.) floated a global tender for the supply of Fibre Distribution Management system (FDMS). True copy of the tender notice dated 13-3-2002 is Annexure-1 to the writ petition.

(6) UNDER the terms of the tender notice the supply of manufactured items was t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top