( 1 ) THIS is a unique case where the petitioner has considered to have a licence to abuse the process of the Court and approached the Court without complying with the order passed by this Court passed earlier. The petitioner was sent a bill for electricity charges by the respondents. As it was not paid, recovery proceedings were initiated against him and citation was issued. Instead of making the payment he filed to Writ Petition No. 4558/ 2002 wherein this Court vide order dated 30-1-2002 considered it proper that a opportunity be given to the petitioner for making representation and therefore one months time was given to the respondent-Authorities to consider his representation. The said representation for adjusting his bills for the work done by him in the Elections for the State Assembly and Parliament was rejected.

( 2 ) BEING aggrieved petitioner again filed writ Petition No. 47654/2002, which was disposed of vide order dated 11-11-2002 obvserving as under-In our opinion, no ground has been made out to quash the citation and the prayer made in that behalf is refused. Sri Arun Tandon has submitted that some time may be granted to the petitioner to enable him