SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(All) 1663

N. K. MITRA
ASHOK KUMAR SINGH CHANDEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.C.Chaturvedi, M.D.Mishra,

N. K. MITRA, C. J.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and going through the facts and circumstances of the case. I find that there is no merit in the application.

2. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that since the C. B. C. I. D. has yet submitted proper charge sheet and has not concluded the investigation, they are protected by the order of Honble I. M. Quddusi, J. dated 13th October. 1999, passed in Criminal Misc. Case No. 642 of 1998, filed under Section 482 Cr. P. C.

3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the respondents that the said order has subsequently been va cated and the said Crl. Misc. Case has subsequently been dismissed. After that another writ application was filed as Criminal Misc. Bail Cancellation Applica tion No. 18394 of 1998 which was allowed and the bail of the petitioner was cancelled

by Honble J,c, Gupia, J. vide order dated 21st May, 1999, which is Annexure-4 to the application. Against the said order of Honble J. C. Gupta J. dated 21st May, 1999,the petitioners moved the Apex Court, as it appears from Annexure-5 to the ap plication, and their application for Special Petition for Leave to appeal was also di








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top