SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(All) 2834

VINOD PRASAD
CHANDAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


Advocates:
C.K.Parekh,

VINOD PRASAD, J.

This revision has been filed by Chandan who is aggrieved by the order dated 31-8-2006 passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division) Judicial Magistrate, Chakia, Chandauli in Miscellaneous Case No. Nil of 2006, Manoj Kumar v. Chandan & Anr. , under Section 156 (3) Cr. P. C. , P. S. Chakia, District Chandauli. By the impugned order the Magistrate concerned has ordered for registration of the F. I. R. and investigation in

pursuance thereof in the crime by the police, on the application under Section 156 (3) Cr. P. C filed by Manoj Kumar (respondent No. 2 ).

2. The facts giving rise to this revision are that on 5-9-2006 an application under Section 156 (3) Cr. P. C. was filed by Manoj Kumar with the allegations that his wife Smt. Usha Devi was enticed away by Chandan (present revisionist) and after exerting undue influence on her got himself photographed with her in objectionable poses. His wife Smt. Usha Devi because of shame could not inform the said fact to the family members. On 12-8-2006 Chandan, (revisionist) sent those photographs to the applicant Manoj Kumar (respondent No. 2) and started blackmailing him for Rs. 10000/-on the pretext that in case the said amount is










































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top